Category Archives: Personal Injury

You just had a Car, Motorcycle or other Motor Vehicle Accident; Now What?

Written on July 14, 2007 by in Car Accidents, Damages, Editorial, Insurance, Motorcycle Accidents, Other Motor Vehicle Accidents, Personal Injury, Products Liability, Truck Accidents

Personal Injury, Car Accident, Motorcycle Accident Injury Lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez

The statistics are amazing. 9 out every 10 persons who drive a car will eventually be involved in a car accident in their lifetimes. 3 out of every 9 persons will be in a car, motorcycle or other motor vehicle accident that involves alcohol.

You can see an article about what to do if you are involved in a car accident or other motor vehicle accident on my personal injury website by clicking here now.

You can see an article about what to do if you are involved in a motorcycle accident on my motorcycle accident lawyer website by clicking here now.

Many car, motorcycle, or other motor vehicle accidents involve someone in the car being injured and some do not. Most personal injury lawyers will not represent you on a contingency basis (no money out of your pocket unless there is a recovery) unless there are injuries involved in an accident. Some firms including mine can provide representation on a fixed fee or hourly basis to help you recover for out of pocket losses when you are in an accident with no injuries.

My firm will represent you on a contingency basis (no money out of your pocket unless there is a recovery) if you have an injury case that we accept.

You will see in the articles that I posted links to above, that it is critical to try to retain an attorney within the first 24-48 hours after an accident to get the prosecution of your case started.

There are many people that come to with me their cases after first going at it alone with the insurance company, only to realize that they are getting no where. Even I as a personal injury lawyer would not represent myself in a personal injury case. A good analogy is that trying to prosecute your own case is like trying to perform a medical operation on yourself. Only a fool has himself for a client!

For those of you who to try to go at it alone, anything you say to the insurance company, including recorded statements can be used against you in your case. It is important to let your attorney speak for you. Once you retain me on your case, we will do all of the work for you. Obviously you will need to keep us up to date on your medical treatment, and if litigation is commenced you will need to cooperate with us to take the case to trial if a trial is necessary.

You must realize that the insurance companies are in business to make money. They will do everything they can to either not pay you, or not pay you what you are entitled to. Do not expect an insurance company adjuster to voluntarily tell you what you are entitled to, or offer it to you. They would probably lose their jobs if they did!

If you have a car, motorcycle, or other motor vehicle accident, in California, and retain my firm; The Law Offices of Norman Gregory Fernandez & Associates, we will send our investigator out to you usually within 24 hours or less to gather the information about your case, get the necessary forms for us to represent you signed, take pictures, etc. Many other personal injury lawyers require you to come into their offices to retain them. We understand that if you are injured this can be a real hassle. We can even email you the necessary forms to sign up with our firm on your case.

The Law Offices of Norman Gregory Fernandez & Associates does everything possible to make the process of signing up, and obtaining a settlement or judgment as convenient as possible for you.

For those of you that do not have medical insurance; our firm can refer you to doctor’s who will take your case on a lien basis so that you can get medical treatment.

Once you retain my firm, our professional pre-litigation staff, litigation staff, and trial attorneys will do everything necessary to get you the maximum settlement or judgment possible.

Beware of any lawyer that makes a guarantee as to the outcome of your case. It is not only unethical to make a guarantee as to the outcome of your case, it is impossible to guarantee the outcome of a case. No lawyer is clairvoyant!

If my firm does take your case, it is because we believe that there is a substantial likelihood of being able to get a recovery for you. We put our money where our mouth is!

If you have a car, motorcycle, or other motor vehicle in the State of California, you may call my office 24 hours a day, 7 days a week for a free consultation at 818-584-8831 extension 1. If it is after hours our automated system will attempt to connect you to a lawyer to speak to you about a case. You may also submit your case through the Internet for a free case evaluation by clicking here now.

I have done consultations at 5:00am on Saturday mornings and try to make myself available to my clients after hours and on the weekends when necessary. Injury accidents do not ordinarily fit the normal 8:00-5:00pm Monday through Friday schedule. You should not sign up with a personal injury lawyer unless they are willing to accommodate your schedule and injuries.

You can check out my personal injury website by clicking here or by going to www.thepersonalinjury.com.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq. , © 2007

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: , , , , ,

The Dirty Little Secret that the Insurance Companies Don’t Want You to Know!

Written on July 13, 2007 by in Car Accidents, Editorial, Insurance, Motorcycle Accidents, Other Motor Vehicle Accidents, Personal Injury, Truck Accidents

California Personal Injury Attorney Norman Gregory Fernandez discusses California Insurance Issues.

Most of us are good citizens and purchase liability insurance to cover us in case we cause an accident. Some people purchase minimum liability coverage and some people purchase more.

When you buy this insurance you are doing it to not only comply with the law, but to protect you and your assets in case you cause a car, motorcycle, or other motor vehicle accident.

Now let’s say that you get into an accident that is your fault; you report the accident to your insurance carrier; you think that your insurance company will cover you pursuant to your insurance policy right? WRONG!

If you read the fine print in your insurance policy you will notice a bunch of language that most non-lawyers would not understand. The gist of the language in plain English is that by accepting the insurance policy, you agree to cooperate with the insurance company if they decide to litigate, and the insurance company is the one who decides whether a case will be settled, not you.

The insurance companies are all about making tons of money and paying as little as possible. Since the advent of legally mandatory insurance coverage (Proposition 213 in California) the insurance companies have become very cavalier because their coffers are full of your money.

Instead of settling meritorious claims, they are forcing claims to be litigated in Court in an attempt to stop personal injury lawyers from obtaining a just recovery for their clients. They know full well that personal injury lawyers do not have as much money to litigate as they do, so their ploy is to starve out the personal injury lawyers and ultimately make it harder for people who are injured in accidents to obtain a recovery. In the end it is the consumer and persons injured in accidents who are hurt, while big business makes more profit at your expense.

Even people who cause accidents and have proper liability insurance to cover the claim are being victimized by the insurance companies.

The insurance companies are experts at deception. With your money, insurance companies contribute money to politicians, and run media ads which blame the personal injury attorneys for making insurance rates so high. What they don’t say is that the backlog in Court is due to the insurance companies not settling claims like they should in the first place.

Now let’s go back to the example of you causing an accident. If the insurance company is unreasonable and refuses to settle a case at or below policy limits, you will then be dragged through the legal system. You may have to answer discovery, appear for depositions, and even take time off to go to trial. This is a long and arduous process that you did not think that would have to deal with when you purchased liability insurance. Surprise!

If you lose at trial, the insurance company will in most cases pay the judgment, but guess what; YOU WILL HAVE A JUDGMENT AGAINST YOU ON YOUR CREDIT REPORT, and in the Court file! Thanks to your insurance company your credit has just been dinged due to no fault of your own.

Is this fair? I submit to you that it is not. You paid for insurance; the insurance company could have settled the case for you within your policy limits; instead, they decided to litigate in an attempt to minimize what they have to pay out so that their profits remain high. They did so without any regard for your credit report, or having your name appear in the public record as having a judgment against you.

Many insurance companies have in-house lawyers; some use outside lawyers. These lawyers are supposed to have a duty to you to do what is in your best interest. The reality is that they do what is in the insurance company’s best interest. This is the ultimate conflict of interest. Ethically the attorney that the insurance company uses to represent you has a duty to you, not the insurance company. The reality is the attorney gets his marching orders from the insurance companies.

A worst case example is the recent Hurricane Katrina disaster. Have you read about all of the poor people who are getting screwed because they are not being covered by their insurance companies for insurance that they paid for?

It’s time for America and consumers to wake up and smell the roses. It is not the trial attorneys that are the problem; its big business wanting to screw the little guy so they can obtain more profit at your expense. Some have made this a political issue. I have even heard President Bush talking about Tort reform, and blaming the trial attorneys for the nation’s health care woes.

Anytime you here tort reform remember one thing; you are about to be screwed! Anytime your right to recover for damages in a Court of law is infringed upon, you will be the victim, while big business rakes in the mula!

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq., © 2007

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: , , , , ,

DOG BITE CASES IN CALIFORNIA; YOU BETTER WATCH YOUR PUP!

Written on July 12, 2007 by in Damages, Dangerous Conditions, Dog Bite, Insurance, Personal Injury, Premises Liability

Dog Bites by California Dog Bite Attorney Norman Gregory FernandezThere is no doubt that Americans love their pets. Human beings and dogs have been living together for tens of thousands of years. There is a saying that “a dog he is a man’s best friend.”

I am myself have three dogs; two Siberian Huskies, and a good old-fashioned American Mutt that I rescued from a pound.

Although a dog may be your best friend, a dog could turn into your worst nightmare if the dog bites and/or otherwise attacks a person.

In the state of California; dog owners are strictly liable for the actions of their dogs. In other words if your dog bites a person, you are strictly liable for all damages that the dog causes.

No matter how well trained your dog is, you really never know when they will bite. Even small breeds can cause bites that result in permanent scarring, and significant damages.

It is your responsibility as a dog owner to ensure that your dog does not bite another person. You should always walk your dog on a leash; secure your yard and home so that the dog cannot run away and bite someone; and secure your dog in a room when you have visitors at your home. If you do not take precautions when it comes to your dog, you could get hit with significant damages in a lawsuit if your dog bites someone.

In some instances, your homeowner’s insurance policy may cover you if your dog bites someone in your home or on your property. In some instances they may not. If you do have homeowners insurance that will cover a dog bite, that is great, however in the end you will probably end up paying a higher premium for homeowners insurance, or have your insurance canceled altogether. If you do not have insurance, you can get stuck with a massive judgment in a lawsuit that you have to pay out of your own pocket.

Last year I settled a dog bite case for over $300,000. I have settled many other dog bite cases as well. Dog bite cases are much more prevalent than people think. In the $300,000 case that I settled, a woman suffered horrendous injuries when a dog bit her in the face while she was petting a dog on a couch. The owner thought that the dog was docile, and reported that there were no previous incidents of the dog biting anybody. It did not matter; in California a dog owner is strictly liable for dog bites. Luckily for the owner of the dog in the case that I am discussing, he had a homeowner’s insurance policy that covered the incident.

There is another issue with respect to dog bite cases that affects landlords who rent their property out to persons who own dogs; a landlord can be held liable for their tenant’s dogs under negligence, and premises liability theory. I have successfully handled cases against landlords whose tenant’s dogs bit a person.

Landlords are not strictly liable for dog bites caused by their tenant’s dogs, however they could be held liable under negligence and premises liability theory, if they know or should have known that any dogs owned by their tenants had a propensity to be aggressive and/or to bite people.

The bottom line is this; love your dogs, enjoy your dogs, but make sure you keep your dogs under control at all times. The consequences of not doing so could be disastrous.

If you are a landlord, you may want to exercise extreme caution when renting to people with dogs.

If you are the victim of a dog bite in the state of California, you may call my office for a free consultation at 818-584-8831 extension 1, or you can click here now to go to my personal injury website.

If you are the owner of a dog that has bitten someone, and you’re not covered by insurance, you may also call me for a free consultation. The same holds true for landlords who are being sued as described above.

If you are not in the state of California, I highly recommend the consult with a competent personal injury attorney in your state.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, ESQ. © 2006

Share
2 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: , , , ,

YOU BETTER CHECK OUT THE PERSON THAT YOU LOAN YOUR CAR TO; YOU COULD BE HELD LEGALLY LIABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS.

Written on July 11, 2007 by in Car Accidents, Damages, Editorial, Insurance, Motorcycle Accidents, Other Motor Vehicle Accidents, Personal Injury, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death

Norman Gregory Fernandez Law Articles

The tort of negligent entrustment in simple language means that you were negligent by allowing a person or persons to use your property such as a car, motorcycle, etc.

Negligence is a legal term of art. It would be very difficult to explain negligence to a non-attorney. However I will try.

Negligence in simple language, is that one person owes a duty of due care to another person, and breaches that duty of due care thus causing damages. The key to negligence is that it must be reasonably foreseeable to an ordinary prudent person that the conduct will result in damages. I will be frank, negligence is much more complicated than the description I just gave, however it will suffice for the purposes of this article.

An example of simple negligence would be one person not paying attention and rear ending another person in their car. The person who did the rear ending would be liable in most circumstances for negligence.

With respect to negligent entrustment, I will give you an example of where you could be held liable for this tort. Let’s say you loan your car to a person who has a suspended driver’s license. Let’s say this person subsequently gets into a car accident. You would most likely be held liable for the damages caused in the accident, because you owed a duty of due care to ensure that you did not loan your car to a person with a suspended driver’s license. In other words, you were negligent by allowing a person with a suspended drivers license to use your car.

Another example would be loaning your car to a person who was obviously intoxicated, who then subsequently gets into an accident. You can be held liable for negligent entrustment for loaning you car to a drunk.

There is a vast array of possible scenarios in which you could be liable for the tort of negligent entrustment. It’s not rocket science, it’s really about common sense. The purpose of this article is just to make you aware of the tort.

Basically it’s a matter of common sense. If you are going to loan a person your car, motorcycle, or other property, you better make sure they have a driver’s license and automobile insurance before you give them the keys unless you’re not concerned about being legally liable for their actions.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, ESQ. , Copyright 2006

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: , , , ,

PRODUCTS LIABILITY IN CALIFORNIA; WHAT YOU SHOULD KNOW.

Written on July 10, 2007 by in Car Accidents, Damages, Editorial, Insurance, Motorcycle Accidents, Other Motor Vehicle Accidents, Personal Injury, Products Liability, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death

Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq.

You may have heard the term products liability in newspapers, political speeches, or from your friends. In a nutshell, the term products liability is a legal term of art used to describe legal causes of action against manufacturers of products, and/or anyone in the chain of distribution, that sell a product which has a; manufacturing defect, design defect, or is otherwise defective due to the negligence of anyone in the chain of the distribution, and which causes injury to the user of that product.

A product could be defective if the manufacturer fails to warn of a risk known to them in using their product, and/or fails to provide a warning label on the product.

You may have heard of some of the infamous products liability cases in the news recently such as; the SUV rollover cases; the asbestos cases; the defective tire cases, tobacco cases etc.

If it were not for lawyers taking these types of cases to court, there would be many dangerous products on the market.

In some types of products liability cases, the person who has been injured may realize that they were injured due to a defective product. In other types of cases the person injured may have not known that there were injured due to a defective product.

In most products liability cases, expert testimony is required to prove that there was a manufacturing or design defect in a product.

In California, products liability causes of action are strict liability actions so long as you can meet your burden of proof. Strict liability means that you do not have to show negligence on the part of the manufacturer or anyone in the chain of distribution to recover damages for defective product.

The bottom line is this; if you have been injured while using a product, driving a car, or using certain types of medication, you should consult with the competent personal injury attorney who can analyze the facts of your case to determine if you have a potential products liability cause of action.

You have the right not to be injured by a product that has a manufacturing or design defect.

If you feel that you have been injured due to a defective product in this state of California you may call my office for a free consultation at 818-584-8831 extension 1, or you may check out my personal injury website by clicking here now.

If you’re out some of this in the California I highly recommend the consult with an attorney in your area.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, ESQ. , Copyright 2006

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: , , , , , ,

FALSE IMPRISONMENT IN THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA; IT IS MORE THAN YOU MAY THINK!

Written on July 8, 2007 by in Damages, Editorial, Intentional Torts, Personal Injury

California Personal Injury Lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez discusses the tort of false imprisonmentMost often when people think about false imprisonment, they think about people being falsely arrested by the police. Most people don’t know that non-police officers can be liable for false imprisonment under many different circumstances.

The purpose of this article is to give a brief synopsis of the civil tort of false imprisonment in the state of California.

A basic definition of civil false imprisonment is; “a person intentionally holding another person within the bounds of a fixed area, without the consent of the person being held, and without a privilege that would excuse the conduct.”

For instance, let’s say that a man locks a woman in a room without her permission. This would be a classic case of civil false imprisonment.

Another example would be a person holding something of value to another person with the intent to make them stay in a certain place, and without the consent of the person whose valuables are being held.

Civil false imprisonment could also include one person grabbing onto another person without their consent, and holding them so that they cannot leave.

There are many other examples of false imprisonment that I can provide, however, the above examples are meant to give you an idea of what the civil tort of false imprisonment is in the state of California.

One key element of the civil tort of false imprisonment is that the person being held must reasonably believe that they cannot leave. Reasonable is a legal term of art used in the legal world. What reasonable basically means is: what would a reasonable prudent person do or believe under similar circumstances.

Another key element of the tort of false imprisonment is that the person doing the imprisoning, must not have a privilege to do so.

Examples of privileges that would allow a person to hold another person within the bounds of a fixed area are: shopkeepers who are investigating shoplifting at a store; civilians who have witnessed a felony, and place the person who committed a felony under citizen’s arrests; or police officers who have probable cause to believe that a crime has been committed.

As with other intentional torts, victims of false imprisonment are entitled to not only compensatory damages, but they may also recover punitive damages. (Punishment)

If you feel you have been the victim of a false imprisonment in the state of California, feel free to call me for a free consultation at 818-584-8831 extension 1, or you may go to my personal injury website by clicking here now.

If you feel that you may have been the victim of a false imprisonment outside of the state of California, I highly recommend you consult with an attorney in your state and/or area.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, ESQ. , Copyright 2006

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: , , , , ,

The Anatomy of a Slip and Fall / Trip and Fall Case in Plain Language!

Written on July 8, 2007 by in Damages, Dangerous Conditions, Editorial, Insurance, Personal Injury, Premises Liability, Slip and Fall, Trip and Fall

California Slip and Fall, trip and fall CasesA slip and fall, and or trip and fall case is pretty much self explanatory. The case arises from a person slipping and/or tripping and falling, and sustaining injuries as a result.

However, there are special circumstances involved in these types of cases which would give rise to you actually being able to pursue a legal case for damages against a person or entity.

THE NECESSITY OF A DANGEROUS CONDITION
The Slip and Fall, and/or Trip and Fall, must be the result of a dangerous condition either on Public or Private Property.

Obviously most human beings slip and/or trip and fall many times in their lives. The law will not allow you to recover each and every time you slip and/or trip and fall.

However, the law will allow you to recover damages for injuries that result due to a dangerous condition on public and/or private property, that the owners or persons responsible for the property knew or should have known about.

WHAT IS A DANGEROUS CONDITION? There are literally an infinite number of dangerous conditions that could result in your slipping and/or tripping and falling. Some examples of dangerous conditions we have dealt with are:
• Dangerously slippery surface
• Water or other wet substance on floor
• Cracks in a sidewalk or walkway
• Poorly maintained stairs or hand rails
• Holes in grass, sidewalk, street, or walkway
• Uneven stairs or surface
• Food and or other objects left on the floor
• Debris left on the floor
• Negligently placed parking stops in parking lots
• Unmarked steps
• Ice on walkway or in parking lot, etc.

THE NECESSITY OF NOTICE TO THE OWNER OR PERSON CONTROLLING THE PROPERTY WHERE THE DANGEROUS CONDITION EXISTS; The owner or person controlling the property where you suffer a slip and/or trip and fall must either know about the dangerous condition, or should have known about the dangerous condition through reasonable inspections, before you can legally recover against them in these types of cases.

This part of a slip and/or trip and fall case is the most difficult to prove, which is why many lawyers do not take or handle these types of cases.

The testimony of an expert witness is required in many of these types of cases to prove that a dangerous condition existed and that the owner or controller of the property either knew or should have known about the condition.

I handle these types of cases. If you have suffered a slip and/trip and fall injury in California you may call me for a free consultation at 818-584-8831 ext.1 or go to my slip and fall website by clicking here for more information.

If you have suffered a slip and/trip and fall injury outside of California I highly recommend that you consult with a lawyer in your area.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq. , Copyright 2006

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Car, Motorcycle, and Other Motor Vehicle Accident Insurance; Rental Car Coverage.

Written on July 7, 2007 by in Car Accidents, Damages, Editorial, Insurance, Motorcycle Accidents, Other Motor Vehicle Accidents, Personal Injury, Truck Accidents

Car and Motorcycle Accidents, Rental Car InsuranceThis type of car, motorcycle, and other motor vehicle insurance coverage will pay you a certain amount of money per day to procure a rental car in case you are in an accident.

Check with your insurance company to ensure that you will be covered either when you are at fault, or the other person is at fault.

Sometimes insurance companies will require you to pay for a rental car out of your own pocket and then submit bills to them for reimbursement. Most of the time this type of coverage only pays $20.00 to $30.00 per day up to a dollar maximum, or for a maximum of 30 days.

In many instances, the cost of getting a rental car and insuring the rental car against loss will exceed your rental car coverage policy. However, we always recommend buying rental car coverage in your insurance policy. We cannot tell you how many times we are faced with client’s who were not at fault in an accident, and they have lost their only transportation.

If the at fault motorist’s insurance does not immediately cover you for rental car payments, you will be stuck paying the entire amount on your own until either your vehicle is repaired, or you procure another vehicle. We know this is not fair. This is why we always recommend getting Rental Car Insurance Coverage.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq. , Copyright 2006

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: ,

WHAT IS A WRONGFUL DEATH CASE IN CALIFORNIA?

Written on July 6, 2007 by in Assault and Battery, Car Accidents, Damages, Dangerous Conditions, Dog Bite, Editorial, Insurance, Intentional Torts, Motorcycle Accidents, Other Motor Vehicle Accidents, Personal Injury, Premises Liability, Products Liability, Slip and Fall, Trip and Fall, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death

Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq. Wrongful Death LawyerA wrongful death case is a case where a person dies due to the intentional or negligent act of another, or entity. The law allows relatives, domestic partners, and persons who depend upon the wrongful death victim for support to sue for wrongful death. The issue of who can sue for wrongful death is covered below.

Wrongful death cases are traditionally amongst the most emotionally charged cases in personal injury.

Wrongful death cases can take many forms. For instance; a loved one could be killed in a car or motorcycle accident that was not their fault; a loved one may have been killed due to excessive use of force by the police or a private security agency; a loved one may have been killed due to a dangerous condition on public or private property, including defective roads or improperly placed road signs; a loved one may have been killed due to the defective construction of a building on real property; an unborn child may have died due to the negligence of a doctor, or due to an assault and battery on the mother; a loved one may have been killed due to a defective product, or negligent repair.

A wrongful death case can arise when someone was injured in an accident, and then subsequently dies as a result of their injuries.

TIME LIMIT TO FILE A LAWSUIT FOR YOUR WRONGFUL DEATH (CALIFORNIA STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS)

The present Statute of Limitations for filing a lawsuit for wrongful death in the State of California is two (2) years from the date of the accident or incident causing the wrongful death. If you do not file a lawsuit within two (2) years, you lose your right to sue! CCP § 335.1

There are exceptions to the above rule if the wrongful death was caused by the negligence of a doctor or health care provider, or due to building defects.

If the defendant to the wrongful death action is a governmental entity, a claim must be filed with that governmental entity within 6 months from the date of the accident. If the entity rejects the claim, you must then file a lawsuit within six (6) months of the rejection.

WHO CAN SUE FOR WRONGFUL DEATH

A cause of action for the death of a person caused by the wrongful act or neglect of another may be asserted by any of the following persons or by the victims personal representative on their behalf:

(a) The victims surviving spouse, domestic partner, children, and offspring of deceased children, or, if there is no surviving children of the victim, the persons, including the surviving spouse or domestic partner, who would be entitled to the property of the victim by intestate succession (a person dying without a will).

(b) Whether or not qualified under (a) above, if they were dependent on the victim, the putative spouse, children of the putative spouse, stepchildren, or parents. ‘Putative spouse’ means the surviving spouse of a void or voidable marriage who is found by the court to have believed in good faith that the marriage to the victim was valid.

(c) A minor, if, at the time of the victims death, the minor resided for the previous 180 days in the victims household and was dependent on the victim for one-half or more of the minor’s support.
As you can see, there are many people that may qualify to sue for wrongful death. Our law firm handles wrongful death cases, and can tell you whether or not you have the right to sue for wrongful death.

Compensation That You Are Entitled To In a Wrongful Death Case
WRONGFUL DEATH DAMAGES

Financial Support – The financial support, if any, that the person who was a victim of wrongful death would have contributed to the family during either the life expectancy that the victim had before [his/her] death or the life expectancy of the person who is suing, whichever is shorter.

The Loss of Gifts and Benefits – The loss of gifts or benefits that the person who is suing would have expected to receive from the victim of a wrongful death.

Funeral and Burial Expenses – The cost of funeral and burial expenses.

The Reasonable Value of Household Services – The reasonable value of household services that the victim would have provided

The loss of love, companionship, comfort, care, assistance, protection, affection, society, moral support that the victim would have provided.

The loss of the enjoyment of sexual relations with the victim.

The loss of training and guidance of the victim.

If you believe you may have a California wrongful death case, it is important to call our office for a free consultation on your specific matter. You may call our office at 818-584-8831 extension 1 for a free consultation, or you may go to our Wrongful Death Website by clicking here. If the your case is outside of the State of California then you should consult with a competent wrongful death lawyer in your State.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq. , Copyright 2006

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: , , , , , ,

What do I look for in a Motorcycle, Car or other Motor Vehicle Injury Case Before I take it on a Contingency Basis!

Written on July 5, 2007 by in Assault and Battery, Car Accidents, Damages, Dangerous Conditions, Editorial, Intentional Torts, Motorcycle Accidents, Other Motor Vehicle Accidents, Personal Injury, Premises Liability, Slip and Fall, Trip and Fall, Truck Accidents

Attorney Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq.As a lawyer, I evaluate many factors before I decide to a take Motorcycle, Car, or other Motor Vehicle injury accident cases on a contingency basis.

The absolute first thing I evaluate is LIABILITY. Is the potential client that comes to me at fault or are they the victim? Although I handle cases for victims and at fault persons, I will not take a case on a contingency basis for at fault persons, and I doubt any other personal injury lawyer will either.

Liability is a tricky subject. In the State of California we use what is called a comparative negligence system to determine liability. In many accidents one or more persons will be 100% at fault in an accident. No problem if my other criteria are met, I will take the case on a contingency basis.

However, let’s say that liability is not crystal clear. Let’s say you have 2 persons who are in an accident and each one shares some fault in the accident. Let’s say one person is deemed to be 10% at fault and the other person is 90% at fault. In most situations I would consider representing the person who was only 10% at fault on a contingency basis.

However, let’s say both persons are 50% at fault, or equally at fault in an accident. Since each party would share the same responsibility for the accident, they could not recover against each other. This would be the type of case I normally would not take unless certain other factors are met.

Picture in your mind a nice pumpkin pie. Cut a piece for your percentage of fault, and the other parties percentage of fault. This will give you a good example of how a Jury or a personal injury lawyer would look at the case. If the other party gets the whole pie chances are that you have a good case that I would consider taking.

The second factor I consider is DAMAGES. How bad are you or the others with you injured? If there are no injuries, most Personal Injury lawyers including myself will not take your case on a contingency basis because the only issue would be property damage.

For a personal injury lawyer such as me, injuries are a paradox. We hate to see our clients injured in a motorcycle, car or other motor vehicle accident, and yet your injuries are directly proportional to how much money we can get for you. The nature and extent of your injuries in an accident is a major factor that I look at before I take a personal injury case on contingency.

The third factor that I look at is whether you have liability insurance. In California if you do not have liability insurance, you are only entitled to your out of pocket losses and that’s it. Most of the damages in personal injury cases usually come from none out of pocket losses such as pain and suffering, loss of enjoyment of life, emotional distress, etc.

If you do not have valid liability insurance, most personal injury lawyers including myself, will not take your case on a contingency basis.

The fourth factor I look at when deciding to take a case is all of the parties insurance policies, as well as the at fault persons assets. If they have a minimum policy of lets say $15,000.00 and no assets, chances are that all you will be able to recover is the $15,000.00 even though you might have $100,000.00 in medical bills. However, you may have Under Insured Coverage for $1,000,000.00. Each circumstance is different. Either way, it takes an experienced lawyer to get you what you are entitled to in a personal injury accident case.

There are about 10 other factors that I look at in evaluating cases. I will send my investigators out to the scene of the accident, as well as look at the property damage. We will evaluate your injuries and medical treatment. We do many things. The sole purpose of our doing personal injury on a contingency basis is to get you the absolute most money that is possible out of your case. We do not make money, unless we get you money, it’s as simple as that. If I have to, I will take your case all the way to a Jury trial if necessary to get you the most possible money.

I believe in cutting to the chase and being frank with my clients. If you have had a motorcycle, car, or other motor vehicle accident in the State of California you may give me a call for a free consultation at 818-584-8831 ext. 1, or visit my personal injury website by clicking here now.

If you have had an accident in a State outside of California, I highly recommend that you seek legal representation in the State in which the accident occurred.

No matter what, do not try to do these types of cases on your own without a lawyer. You may think that you are saving money. In the end, the insurance companies will know that they have a sucker on their hands. They love injured victims who do not have lawyers!

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq. , Copyright 2006

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: , , , , ,

Car, Motorcycle, and other Vehicle Insurance / Why You Should Buy Under Insured Coverage!

Written on July 5, 2007 by in Car Accidents, Damages, Insurance, Intentional Torts, Motorcycle Accidents, Other Motor Vehicle Accidents, Personal Injury, Truck Accidents

The Law Offices of Norman Gregory Fernandez & AssociatesUnder Insured insurance coverage will cover you for the difference between your actual damages, and the at fault persons insurance coverage.

In other words, let say you are hit by a person who has minimum insurance coverage, (10k/15k/30k) who is at fault in the accident. Under normal circumstances the most you will be able to recover from their insurance company is for your injuries, and out of pocket loss, etc., is $15,000.00. Let’s say your actual medical bills and out of pocket loss is $100,000.00 (This does not include the other non-out of pocket damages you are entitled to!). What are you going to do?

If the person who hits you does not have any assets there is little chance that you will ever collect the $85,000.00 difference from them if you sue to get a judgment. If you do get a judgment, they could declare bankruptcy and discharge the debt they owe to you in its entirety.

We find that in many instances, an at fault persons coverage is not enough to cover our client’s actual damages and they get stuck in the catch 22 situation discussed above.

We believe that it is always better to error on the side of caution. We always recommend purchasing Under Insured Coverage for a minimum of $100,000.00 or more. The more the better. This is your way of insuring yourself, against an at fault persons deficient coverage.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq. , Copyright 2006

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: , ,

If you Borrow Money to Buy Your Vehicle Then You Need Gap Insurance!

Written on July 4, 2007 by in Car Accidents, Damages, Insurance, Intentional Torts, Motorcycle Accidents, Other Motor Vehicle Accidents, Personal Injury, Truck Accidents

Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq.This type of Insurance policy covers the difference between the Fair Market Value of your vehicle, and what you actually owe on the vehicle if your vehicle is totaled in an accident.

When you purchase a new or used car, motorcycle, or other vehicle on credit from a dealer, more often than not you are required to not only purchase Comprehensive and Collision insurance, but you are also required to purchase GAP insurance so that the finance company knows that will be paid in full if the car is totaled in an accident.

Regardless of whether it is required or not, we always recommend purchasing GAP Insurance coverage if you owe a lender money for a car, motorcycle or other vehicle.

You do not want to get stuck paying thousand’s of dollars on a car, motorcycle or other vehicle loan after an accident, if your vehicle has been declared a total loss after an accident. Comprehensive and Collision Insurance coverage only covers up to the fair market value of the car, not what you owe a lender for your vehicle.

We cannot tell you how many times victims of accidents find out the hard way that their insurance company will not pay enough money on a property damage claim, to cover what is owed on the vehicle. Nobody wants to get stuck for thousands of dollars in payments on a vehicle they no longer own, or that is totaled. We recommend getting GAP Insurance on your vehicle if you owe money on the vehicle.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq. , Copyright 2006

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: ,

Civil Assault and Battery in Plain Language

Written on July 4, 2007 by in Assault and Battery, Damages, Intentional Torts, Personal Injury

Assault and BatteryI have heard many people throw the term of assault around to describe someone being physically abused. The purpose of this article is to describe what the civil tort of assault and the civil tort of battery are in plain language.

The legal definition of civil Assault is; an intentional act which causes a reasonable and imminent apprehension of a harmful or offensive contact which is un-consented. I know, it sounds like a bunch of gibberish.

Civil Assault basically boils down to this; if someone gets in your face and raises their hand as though they’re going to hit you, and ordinary people in a similar circumstance would believe the same thing, you have just been assaulted. Civil assault does not require or an actual touching, or physical contact to be legally actionable.

The legal definition of a Civil Battery is; an intentional act which causes a harmful or offensive contact which is un-consented. Yes I know, what does that mean?

Civil Battery basically boils down to this; if someone hits you, and you have not consented to being hit, you have just been battered.

In the civil realm, battery can take many forms. For instance, a battery can occur if someone intentionally hits or touches something that is connected to you. An example of this type of battery would be; let’s say you are holding a paper plate full of food, and someone hits the plate purposely to knock the food at of your hand; you have just been battered. Another example of this type of battery would be; let’s say you are sitting in your car and someone comes up and hits your car purposefully; you have just been battered.

I am not going to go into a dissertation on the multitude of possibilities here. The purpose of this article is just to describe an assault and battery is in plain language. So you now know that assault, and battery, are two separate torts. Each is a distinct and separate tort, which is a separate legal cause of action.

In the civil realm, you have a right to sue for assault and battery if you are the victim of these torts. With respect to damages, you are not only entitled to all damages proximately caused by your being assaulted and/or battered, and you may also be entitled to punitive damages.

Punitive damages are punishment damages. Many of you have heard the term punitive damages and do not know what it means. In civil law, punitive damages are ordinarily allowed by statute, or for common law torts involving intentional acts. Punitive damages are allowed for particularly egregious conduct.

If you believe you been the victim of an assault and battery in the state of California, you may call me for a free consultation at 818-584-8831 extension 1, or visit my website at www.thepersonalinjury.com.

If you believe that you been the victim of an assault and battery in a state other than California, I suggest that you consult with an attorney from that state to determine if you have a cause of action.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq. , Copyright 2006

Share
1 Comment - Leave a comment!
Tags: , , ,

Car and Motorcycle Insurance: Uninsured Motorist Coverage/Bodily Injury (UM/BI)

Written on July 4, 2007 by in Car Accidents, Insurance, Motorcycle Accidents, Other Motor Vehicle Accidents, Personal Injury

Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq.The name speaks for itself. This type of insurance coverage will cover you for your “non-property” related damages (Bodily Injury, Pain and Suffering, Loss of Enjoyment of Life, Emotional Distress) in a Car or Motorcycle injury accident, if the other motorist who is “at fault,” has no liability insurance.

In the State of California we feel that this type of coverage is mandatory due to the vast amount of people driving around illegally without insurance. This coverage will also cover hit and runs.

We recommend purchasing the most UM/BI coverage you can afford, and at least a minimum of $100,000.00 if you drive a car, and a minimum of $500,000 if you ride a motorcycle.

If you are in an accident and the other motorist is uninsured, this coverage will be your only recourse in many instances. Do not drive in California without some kind of UM/BI coverage.

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq. , Copyright 2006

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: , ,

Welcome to the California Personal Injury Law Blog.

Written on July 4, 2007 by in Assault and Battery, Car Accidents, Damages, Dangerous Conditions, Dog Bite, Editorial, Insurance, Intentional Torts, Motorcycle Accidents, Off Topic Articles, Other Motor Vehicle Accidents, Personal Injury, Premises Liability, Products Liability, Slip and Fall, Trip and Fall, Truck Accidents, Wrongful Death

Califonria Personal Injury Lawyer Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq.I wish to welcome everyone to the California Personal Injury Law Blog. Like the name infers, this Blog is about Personal Injury Law, and everything related thereto.

I will write articles related to Personal Injury Law which will be primarily geared towards California Law. However, I might offer commentary, or post links to Personal Injury subjects outside of the State of California. On some occasions I may post articles that are totally off topic. I will try to mix things up and make this blog interesting.

I am a California Personal Injury Lawyer, licensed to practice law in the State of California, and before the United States Court, Central District.

My firm has offices in Southern California and Northern California. We handle personal injury cases throughout the great State of California.

If you want a free consultation on a California Personal Injury case, you may call my office at 818-584-8831, you may contact me through this blog by clicking the contact button on the top of the blog or by Clicking Here, or you may go to my Personal Injury Website at www.thepersonalinjury.com . If you have a non California Personal Injury Case and you need a lawyer, I may be able to find someone for you in your State. Use the contact button at the top of the Blog to contact me and I will see what I can do.

I am requesting that everyone read the Legal Disclaimer, by clicking on the Legal Disclaimer button on the top of the Blog, or by Clicking Here Now.

I invite everyone to register as members of the California Personal Injury Law Blog by Clicking Here Now, or by clicking the register button on the left sidebar. The advantage of being a member is that you will be notified of new articles that I write, and can more easily post comments once you are logged in.

I also invite everyone to post comments about the articles that you read on the California Personal Injury Law Blog whether you are a registered user or not. Just click on the comments text below each post that you want to comment on.

Finally, you may contact me by using the contact button on the top of the Blog, to suggest article ideas to me, or to suggest that I write an article on a Personal Injury Law subject that you might be interested in. I offer no guarantees that I will write a specific article, but I will try to accommodate my readers.

I recommend that you bookmark this blog in your browser, read all of the articles, and keep coming back. You never know when the day will come that you or your loved ones or friends may be the victim of a personal injury. What you read here may help you

By Norman Gregory Fernandez, Esq., © 2007

Share
0 Comments - Leave a comment!
Tags: , , ,
Newer Posts »